Amarick Gill

Amarick Gill is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 9.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amarick Gill has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	10 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	10 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appeal	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receiving stolen property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Application for Adjournment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Weapons Charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rioting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amarick Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amarick Gill has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Amarick Gill LLC	3 cases	27% of cases	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Adjournment Application in Drug Trafficking Appeal(Aug 2018) Norasharee v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act Appeal - Presumption of Knowledge and Co-Accused Statements(Mar 2017) PP v Kisshahllini: Drug Importation at Woodlands Checkpoint - Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2016)
Amarick Gill & Co	3 cases	27% of cases	PP v Saiful Rizam: Theft as Servant & Dishonest Receiving of Stolen Property(Jan 2014) Abdul Salam v PP: Conspiracy to Traffic Drugs - Conviction & Sentence Appeal(Nov 2010) PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation(Mar 2010)
Leo Fernando	2 cases	18% of cases	Ismail v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure(Mar 2004) Public Prosecutor v Ismail: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Injury(Nov 2003)
James Masih & Co	1 cases	9% of cases	PP v Fazely: Complicity, Common Intention & Unlawful Assembly in Murder & Rioting(Mar 2003)
Amrick Gill & Co	1 cases	9% of cases	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal(Mar 2013)
Amarick Gill and Co	1 cases	9% of cases	Shanmugam v PP: Importation of Cannabis and Knowledge of Drug Possession(Jan 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amarick Gill's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.3 parties avg	3.3	64%
Neutral	23.8 parties avg	3.8	18%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amarick Gill's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(64%)	64%
Neutral	2(18%)	18%
Partial	1(9%)	9%
Won	1(9%)	9%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Adjournment Application in Drug Trafficking Appeal 01 Aug 2018 Tika Pesik (Appellant)Neutral	01 Aug 2018	Tika Pesik (Appellant): Appeal AdjournedAppeal adjourned to an early date to be fixed, such date not to be before 16 August 2018.
2	Norasharee v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act Appeal - Presumption of Knowledge and Co-Accused Statements 09 Mar 2017 Norasharee Bin Gous (Appellant)Lost	09 Mar 2017	Norasharee Bin Gous (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	PP v Kisshahllini: Drug Importation at Woodlands Checkpoint - Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Apr 2016 Kisshahllini A/P Paramesuvaran (Defendant)Lost	06 Apr 2016	Kisshahllini A/P Paramesuvaran (Defendant): Accused sentenced to 22 years’ imprisonmentAccused sentenced to 22 years’ imprisonment, including 12 months in lieu of caning.
4	PP v Saiful Rizam: Theft as Servant & Dishonest Receiving of Stolen Property 14 Jan 2014 Muhammad Yunus bin Aziz (Respondent)Neutral	14 Jan 2014	Muhammad Yunus bin Aziz (Respondent): Sentence UpheldThe original aggregate sentence of fourteen months' imprisonment was upheld.
5	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal 07 Mar 2013 Mervin Singh (Appellant)Won	07 Mar 2013	Mervin Singh (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal found that the First Appellant rebutted the presumption in s 18(2) of the MDA on a balance of probabilities and set aside his conviction.
6	Abdul Salam v PP: Conspiracy to Traffic Drugs - Conviction & Sentence Appeal 07 Nov 2010 Abdul Salam bin Musthafa (Appellant)Partial	07 Nov 2010	Abdul Salam bin Musthafa (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against conviction allowed in part; sentence reduced.
7	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation 09 Mar 2010 Toh Huang Shee Adrian (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2010	Toh Huang Shee Adrian (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and ten strokes of the cane.
8	Shanmugam v PP: Importation of Cannabis and Knowledge of Drug Possession 13 Jan 2005 Shanmugam s/o Murugesu (Appellant)Lost	13 Jan 2005	Shanmugam s/o Murugesu (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence of death for importing cannabis was dismissed.
9	Ismail v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure 02 Mar 2004 Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Appellant)Lost	02 Mar 2004	Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
10	Public Prosecutor v Ismail: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Injury 18 Nov 2003 Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant)Lost	18 Nov 2003	Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was found guilty and convicted as charged.
11	PP v Fazely: Complicity, Common Intention & Unlawful Assembly in Murder & Rioting 16 Mar 2003 Fazely Bin Rahmat (Respondent)Lost	16 Mar 2003	Fazely Bin Rahmat (Respondent): Convicted of causing grievous hurtAcquitted of murder but convicted of causing grievous hurt under s 325, read with s 149, of the Penal Code.