Edmond Lim Tian Zhong

Edmond Lim Tian Zhong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 83% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Secrecy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Reasonable costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edmond Lim Tian Zhong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	6 cases	100% of cases	Alliance Divine Impex Pte Ltd v Arulappan Tony: Application for Inspection of Banker's Book(Sep 2024) General Hotel Management v The Wave Studio: Copyright Ownership & Offer to Settle(Apr 2023) Larpin v Nargolwala: Costs Determination in SICC Dispute over Property Transaction and Fraud Allegations(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edmond Lim Tian Zhong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 5 (83%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	23.7 parties avg	3.7	33%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%
Won	34.7 parties avg	4.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edmond Lim Tian Zhong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	784,681.56	156,936.315 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Alliance Divine Impex Pte Ltd v Arulappan Tony: Application for Inspection of Banker's Book 03 Sep 2024 DBS Bank Ltd (Non-party)Neutral	03 Sep 2024	DBS Bank Ltd (Non-party): NeutralDBS Bank Ltd was a non-party to the application and agreed to the terms of the order sought by the applicant pursuant to s 175(1) of the EA.
2	General Hotel Management v The Wave Studio: Copyright Ownership & Offer to Settle 03 Apr 2023 General Hotel Management, Ltd (Appellant)Partial	03 Apr 2023	General Hotel Management, Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Costs order revised downwards from $300,000 plus disbursements to $200,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Larpin v Nargolwala: Costs Determination in SICC Dispute over Property Transaction and Fraud Allegations 25 Aug 2022 Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant)Won	25 Aug 2022	Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant): Costs awardedPlaintiffs to pay the defendants S$392,340.78 inclusive of GST and disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Larpin v Nargolwala: Application for Indemnity Costs in SICC Dispute 24 Apr 2022 Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant)Neutral	24 Apr 2022	Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant): Application for indemnity costs refusedThe defendants' application for indemnity costs was refused. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Larpin v Nargolwala: Rescission Claim for Villa Purchase Based on Misrepresentation 20 Feb 2022 Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant)Won	20 Feb 2022	Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lew v Nargolwala: Agency, Contract Formation, Trusts & Conflict of Laws 09 Feb 2021 Aparna Nargolwala (Respondent, Appellant)Won	09 Feb 2021	Aparna Nargolwala (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Lew ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.