Johan bin Ismail

Johan bin Ismail is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 11.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	9 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	7 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Courier	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of Statements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Johan bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Johan bin Ismail has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Johan Ismail & Co	5 cases	56% of cases	Muhammad Hamir B Laka: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2022) PP v Wan Azasar: Misuse of Drugs Act Importation - Diamorphine, Methamphetamine, Cannabis(Apr 2022) PP v Fazali Bin Mohamed: Trafficking in Cannabis and Cannabis Mixture under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2018)
Johan Ismail & Company	4 cases	44% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Jafar Shatig: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2015) Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2015) Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Sentencing under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Johan bin Ismail's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.3 parties avg	2.3	89%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Johan bin Ismail's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(89%)	89%
Won	1(11%)	11%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Muhammad Hamir B Laka: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Aug 2022 Muhammad Hamir B Laka (Defendant)Lost	21 Aug 2022	Muhammad Hamir B Laka (Defendant): Conviction on the 1st Charge (Amended)The Defendant was convicted on the 1st Charge (Amended) under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
2	PP v Wan Azasar: Misuse of Drugs Act Importation - Diamorphine, Methamphetamine, Cannabis 17 Apr 2022 Wan Azasar bin Wan Yusoff (Defendant)Lost	17 Apr 2022	Wan Azasar bin Wan Yusoff (Defendant): Guilty of the First, Second and Third ChargesThe accused was found guilty on all three charges of importing controlled drugs.
3	PP v Fazali Bin Mohamed: Trafficking in Cannabis and Cannabis Mixture under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jan 2018 Fazali Bin Mohamed (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2018	Fazali Bin Mohamed (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to deathAccused convicted on both charges and sentenced to death.
4	PP v Suthakar J Raman: Drug Trafficking - Common Intention under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jun 2017 Suthakar J Raman (Defendant)Lost	27 Jun 2017	Suthakar J Raman (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe court found the accused guilty as charged.
5	Public Prosecutor v Jafar Shatig: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Jul 2015 Jafar Shatig bin Abdul Karim (Defense)Lost	26 Jul 2015	Jafar Shatig bin Abdul Karim (Defense): Guilty as chargedAccused was convicted of trafficking in 56.17g of diamorphine under s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) and sentenced to life imprisonment, with effect from 5 January 2012, and to 16 strokes of the cane.
6	Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Feb 2015 Mohd Suief bin Ismail (Defendant)Lost	02 Feb 2015	Mohd Suief bin Ismail (Defendant): LostConvicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
7	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Sentencing under the Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Oct 2013 Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant)Won	23 Oct 2013	Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant): Benefit of the doubt givenThe accused was given the benefit of the doubt and treated as a courier under the new sentencing provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
8	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Aug 2013 Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant)Lost	26 Aug 2013	Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty of the two charges.
9	Public Prosecutor v Amir bin Jubir: Trafficking of Diamorphine 28 May 2008 Amir bin Jubir (Defendant)Lost	28 May 2008	Amir bin Jubir (Defendant): ConvictedAmir bin Jubir was convicted on the charge of trafficking diamorphine.