Tan Shi Yun Jolene

Tan Shi Yun Jolene is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and security for costs. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Liens	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Societies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Shi Yun Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Shi Yun Jolene has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	3 cases	75% of cases	Natixis v Seshadri Rajagopalan: Admiralty Actions, In Rem Writs, and Judicial Management under IRDA(May 2024) Cova Group v Advanced Submarine Networks: Security for Costs in Construction Equipment Rental Dispute(Jun 2023) Natixis v Owner of MIRACLE HOPE: Setting Aside Arrest Warrant for Material Non-Disclosure(May 2020)
BR Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Shepherdson v Singapore Recreation Club: Damages for Wrongful Suspension(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Shi Yun Jolene's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	75%
Won	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Shi Yun Jolene's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	17,600.00	5,866.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Natixis v Seshadri Rajagopalan: Admiralty Actions, In Rem Writs, and Judicial Management under IRDA 01 May 2024 Nan Chiau Maritime (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant)Won	01 May 2024	Nan Chiau Maritime (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; the plaintiffs’ applications are dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Cova Group v Advanced Submarine Networks: Security for Costs in Construction Equipment Rental Dispute 26 Jun 2023 Cova Group Holdings Ltd (Claimant, Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2023	Cova Group Holdings Ltd (Claimant, Appellant): Appeals DismissedClaimant's appeals in RA 57, RA 58, RA 74 and RA 75 were dismissed.
3	Natixis v Owner of MIRACLE HOPE: Setting Aside Arrest Warrant for Material Non-Disclosure 26 May 2020 Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (2nd Intervener)Lost	26 May 2020	Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (2nd Intervener): Application to set aside the warrant of arrest is dismissedApplication to set aside the warrant of arrest is dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD for Singapore).
4	Shepherdson v Singapore Recreation Club: Damages for Wrongful Suspension 21 Feb 2019 Singapore Recreation Club (Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2019	Singapore Recreation Club (Defendant): Damages Awarded AgainstDamages awarded against the Defendant for deprivation of membership rights and privileges ($3,600) and mental distress ($14,000) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).