Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Ltd

Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 20 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 44.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 77.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 20 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
6.1
Complex Cases
7 (77.8%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost55.6 parties avg
Won46.8 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201719.0 parties avg
201315.0 parties avg
201036.7 parties avg
200935.0 parties avg
200816.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost5(55.6%)
Won4(44.4%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.002 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20171
1
20131
1
20102
21
20092
12
20081
1

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
30 Nov 2017
DefendantLostThe court ordered Maxz Universal and Rodney Tan to purchase Tan Eck Hong's shares at a fair value, adjusted for the oppressive actions. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
04 Jul 2013
DefendantLostOrdered to transfer the TR shares to which Lim is entitled under the trust to him within 30 days.
07 Sep 2010
DefendantLostFirst Rights Issue struck down. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28 Feb 2010
DefendantWonAppeal against the order for Treasure to make discovery of documents was allowed.
25 Feb 2010
PlaintiffLostThe plaintiff's claims for breach of director's duties were dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21 Oct 2009
DefendantWonThe plaintiff’s claims in respect to the breach of section 76(1)(a) and the cancellation of the share allotment were struck out.
12 Jul 2009
Plaintiff, DefendantLostClaim for specific performance dismissed.
12 Jan 2009
RespondentWonAppeal against the company was dismissed.
29 Jun 2008
DefendantWonThe court ruled that the resolution did not contravene the Articles of Association of MDG. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.