RHB Bank Berhad

RHB Bank Berhad is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 57.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 85.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

RHB Bank Berhad has been represented by 4 law firms and 8 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of RHB Bank Berhad's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
7.6
Complex Cases
6 (85.7%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost12.0 parties avg
Neutral27.5 parties avg
Won49.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202424.5 parties avg
202319.0 parties avg
2018110.0 parties avg
2017118.0 parties avg
200023.5 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of RHB Bank Berhad's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost1(14.3%)
Neutral2(28.6%)
Won4(57.1%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD2,385,042.895 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20242
11
20231
1
20181
1
20171
1
20002
11

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
17 Dec 2024
ClaimantWonWinding-up order made against Bob TX Food Empire Pte Ltd, Valulogistics Pte Ltd, and Valusports Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
07 Apr 2024
OtherNeutralRHB Bank Berhad was the creditor who filed a winding up application against Boldtek Holdings Limited.
16 May 2023
Non-partyWonRHB Bank Berhad's objection to the moratorium application was effectively upheld as the application was dismissed.
15 Mar 2018
DefendantNeutralShare of sales proceeds determined by the rolling charge method. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
01 Mar 2017
DefendantWonEntitled to claim proceeds from the sale of pepper stock in proportion to their contribution. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26 Oct 2000
PlaintiffWonJudgment for the Plaintiff for the outstanding amount of $11,925,214.44 as at 31 March 2000 and further interest accruing thereon (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
09 Oct 2000
DefendantLostJudgment against the Defendant; the defendant was found to be negligent in the sale of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).