VJQ

VJQ is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

VJQ has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Ethos Law Corporation	2 cases	Oh Kim Heoh Mimi

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of VJQ's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of VJQ's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sgca-82 11 Aug 2021	11 Aug 2021	Respondent	LostThe husband's share of the matrimonial pool was reduced, and he was ordered to pay the wife an additional $52,665.73.
2	2020-sghcf-13 28 Sep 2020	28 Sep 2020	Appellant, Respondent	PartialThe sum of $140,000 being the purchase price of the Primefield shares was excluded from the matrimonial assets. The sum of $176,250 being the sum of the undisbursed housing loan for the Botanique apartment was excluded from the matrimonial assets, with liberty to apply in the event that the loan is not disbursed. The children’s monthly maintenance is payable on the 3rd instead of the 23rd of each month.