Validity

Validity is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2016 to 2017.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Validity, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Joyce A. Tan & Partners LLC100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Salem Ibrahim LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Ravindran Associates0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Via Law Corporation100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Validity, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Low Chai Chong100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Long Ai Ming100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Foo Maw Jiun100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Lim Ying Sin Daniel50.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Leow Jiamin100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Jevon Louis0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Bryan Manaf Ghows100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Koh Kai Ling Angeline0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Ismail bin Atan0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Khadijah binte Yasin100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Sun Electric v Sunseap: Patent Validity, Groundless Threats, and RevocationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore03 May 2017
Application to strike out parts of the Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection is declined. The Defendants are ordered to amend paragraphs 4, 14 and 16 of the Defence and Counterclaim.
2Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement, Validity & Groundless ThreatHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Mar 2017
Judgment for Defendant on non-infringement; Injunction granted to Defendant against Plaintiff's groundless threats.
3Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement, Moulding Machine, Inventive StepHigh Court21 Dec 2016
Judgment for Plaintiff