UNCITRAL Model Law
UNCITRAL Model Law is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 24 cases from 2001 to 2023.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in UNCITRAL Model Law, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP20.00% success rate | 5 cases20.8% of area |
WongPartnership LLP60.00% success rate | 5 cases20.8% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC25.00% success rate | 4 cases16.7% of area |
Providence Law Asia LLC50.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
AsiaLegal LLC100.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Oon & Bazul LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Wong Partnership50.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases4.2% of area |
Tan Kok Quan Partnership100.00% success rate | 1 cases4.2% of area |
Damodara Ong LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases4.2% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in UNCITRAL Model Law, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Philip Jeyaretnam0.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam50.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Alvin Yeo0.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Francis Xavier s/o Subramaniam Xavier Augustine0.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Colin Liew33.33% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Michael Hwang100.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Cavinder Bull50.00% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Chong Wan Yee Monica33.33% success rate | 2 cases8.3% of area |
Koh Swee Yen100.00% success rate | 1 cases4.2% of area |
Axl Rizqy100.00% success rate | 1 cases4.2% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 24 most recent judgments out of 24 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DBX & DBY v DBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Margin Financing Facility Dispute | Singapore International Commercial Court | 14 Nov 2023 | Application dismissed. |
2 | - | 23 Oct 2023 | Unknown | |
3 | Deutsche Telekom AG v. Republic of India: BIT, Arbitration, State Immunity, Enforcement of Award | SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT | 29 Jan 2023 | SUM 155, SUM 24, SUM 45 and SUM 720 are dismissed. |
4 | United Securities Sdn Bhd v United Overseas Bank: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of Foreign Proceedings | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 09 Aug 2021 | Appeal Dismissed |
5 | CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards & Costs | International Arbitration Act | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 20 Jun 2021 | Phase II Partial Awards set aside in so far as they order payment of the Remaining Amounts. Costs Award set aside. Appeal allowed. |
6 | CJM v CJT: Recourse Against Arbitration Award for Dismissal of Earn-Out Payment Claim | SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT | 14 Jun 2021 | Plaintiffs' Originating Summons to set aside two paragraphs in the Award is dismissed. The plaintiffs’ application to amend their Originating Summons to set aside two further paragraphs is likewise dismissed. |
7 | Gokul Patnaik v Nine Rivers Capital Ltd: Setting Aside SIAC Award for Put Option Dispute | SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT | 11 Nov 2020 | Application dismissed. |
8 | CDI v CDJ: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Arbitration Award for Vessel Sale | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Jun 2020 | Defendant's application dismissed. |
9 | BBA v BAZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Misrepresentation in Pharmaceutical Stake Sale | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 27 May 2020 | Appeal Dismissed |
10 | BXH v BXI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction & Assignment of Arbitration Agreement | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 01 Apr 2020 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
11 | CES v IATA: Jurisdiction Challenge in International Arbitration | Singapore International Commercial Court | 23 Mar 2020 | Originating Summons dismissed |
12 | BTN v BTP: Review of Arbitral Award on Jurisdiction and Res Judicata in Termination Dispute | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 15 Sep 2019 | Originating Summons dismissed with costs. |
13 | Sinolanka Hotels v Interna Contract: Dispute over Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction | High Court | 05 Jul 2018 | Application dismissed. |
14 | Jiangsu Overseas Group v. Concord Energy: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Lack of Jurisdiction in Green Petroleum Coke Contracts | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 09 Aug 2016 | Applications dismissed with costs. |
15 | AYH v AYI: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Exceeding Submission Scope | High Court | 22 Nov 2015 | Application dismissed with costs. |
16 | William Jacks v Nelson Honey: Long-Arm Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 15 Sep 2015 | Summons dismissed on the condition that William Jacks abandons proceedings in New Zealand if it fails to dismiss or stay proceedings there. |
17 | BLC v BLB: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice | Court of Appeal | 29 Jul 2014 | Appeal Allowed |
18 | Piallo GmbH v Yafriro International: Stay of Proceedings for Arbitration | High Court | 01 Jul 2013 | Stay of proceedings granted in favour of arbitration. |
19 | Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Wrong Choice of Law | High Court | 13 Aug 2012 | Application dismissed. |
20 | PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia v Dexia Bank: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Public Policy | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 30 Nov 2006 | Appeal Dismissed |
21 | Philippine Gov't v PIATCO: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Airport Terminal Construction Dispute | High Court | 16 Nov 2006 | Application dismissed with costs. |
22 | PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia v Magma Nusantara Ltd: Arbitration Agreement & Tribunal Jurisdiction Dispute | High Court | 09 Sep 2003 | Application dismissed except for the order on costs, which was set aside. The applicant shall pay the respondent its costs of these proceedings. |
23 | ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd: Setting Aside Interim Arbitral Award - Amending Originating Motion | High Court | 07 May 2003 | Application to amend the originating motion was partially allowed. Leave was granted to add one new ground, but the application was dismissed for all other proposed amendments. |
24 | Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey v Tan Poh Leng Stanley: Arbitrator's Power to Revisit Award | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 21 Jun 2001 | Appeal Allowed |